Matthew 15:21–28 is not about a non-Israelite being included in the covenant, but about a lost Israelite being restored.
She called Jesus “Son of David”—a Messianic title known only to Israel.
The phrase “Son of David” is a covenantal, messianic title tied to Israel’s promises (2 Sam 7:12–14; Isa 9:6–7). No true pagan would use it unless they had knowledge of Israel’s scriptures and hope. This suggests she was familiar with the promises made to her ancestors—indicating Israelite descent.
She was said to have “great faith”—a trait reserved for God’s covenant people.
Jesus praised her faith (Matt. 15:28), and Jude 1:3 tells us that “the faith” was delivered to the saints (Israel). Faith was not some general quality—it was covenantal trust granted to Israel’s remnant. Her possession of it identifies her as one of God’s own.
Her being called a “dog” reflects her perceived uncleanness—not her ethnicity.
Jesus initially refers to her as a “dog” (Matt. 15:26), which reflects how Israelites viewed the scattered, estranged members of the nation—unclean and cut off (see Ezek. 34:4–6; Hos. 2:23). Lost Israelites were considered no better than Gentiles until they were restored to covenant. Her “dog” status shows how far she had fallen from covenant identity—but not that she was never in it.
The label “Canaanite” is geographic, not genealogical.
By the first century, terms like “Canaanite” could reflect where someone lived, not their bloodline. Much like Paul was a “Jew” but also a Roman citizen, this woman could have been an Israelite living in the former land of Canaan (now Phoenicia). Her true lineage is implied by her faith and covenantal awareness.
“Yes, Lord, yet even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their masters’ table
She accepts her estranged status—but still identifies with the covenant.
By saying “Yes, Lord,” she agrees with Jesus’ statement that she’s like a dog (i.e., unclean, outside the house). But she doesn’t deny her connection to the master’s table. That phrase—“their masters’ table”—implies she knows who the true Master is, and that she’s still part of His household, even if currently out of place. This is classic language of scattered Israel—those once estranged, now returning.
She understands her dependence on Israel’s covenant blessings.
“Crumbs” are a symbol of mercy extended even in judgment. She’s not asking for a full inheritance—just mercy flowing from it. This echoes the prophetic pattern where the remnant cries out for mercy during Israel’s restoration (e.g., Hos. 14:1–2, Jer. 31:18–20). She knows the children (Judah) are still eating—but she still wants access to what flows from the covenant promises.
She demonstrates the humility God required from returning Israel.
Throughout the prophets, the restored remnant is portrayed as humbled (see Hos. 5:15; Zeph. 3:12). Her reply shows this exact humility. She doesn’t demand; she pleads. She doesn’t argue her worth; she appeals to mercy. This is the posture of the penitent, returning Israelite.
She acknowledges Jesus’ authority and Israelite identity.
Calling Him “Lord” and “Son of David,” and appealing to the masters’ table, she places herself under the authority of Israel’s Messiah and His people. That’s not something a pagan outsider would do—it shows she knows who the true Israel is, and that she once belonged there.
Her reply unlocks her restoration.
Jesus responds, “O woman, great is your faith!” and grants her request. This shows her faith wasn’t just belief in healing—it was belief in the covenant and her place in it. Her restoration is not just her daughter’s healing—it’s her own reintegration into the covenant fold.
No comments:
Post a Comment