Why do the majority of Blacks today support the Democrats who ENSLAVED, OPPRESSED and MURDERED their Black Ancestors???

 

The question of why many Black Americans support the Democratic Party, despite the party's historical association with slavery, segregation, and opposition to civil rights in the 19th and early 20th centuries, is a complex topic that involves significant political realignment

. 

While historical records show that the Democratic Party of the 1800s and early 1900s—particularly its Southern faction—defended slavery and enforced Jim Crow laws, a major ideological shift occurred in the mid-20th century. 

Historical Shift and Realignment

• 19th Century: The Republican Party was founded in the 1850s with the goal of stopping the expansion of slavery, and it was the party of Abraham Lincoln, who led the efforts to abolish slavery.
• The New Deal (1930s): Black voters began moving away from the Republican Party during the Great Depression, attracted to the economic relief provided by Democratic President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal.
• Civil Rights Era (1960s): The most significant shift occurred in the 1960s. Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson pushed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 through Congress.
• Party Realignment: Following these actions, southern segregationists and conservative Democrats began switching to the Republican Party, while Black voters became a key constituency of the Democratic Party. 

Reasons for Continued Support

• Policy Positions: Many Black voters today view the Democratic Party as the champion of civil rights, voting rights, and government intervention to assist the underprivileged, aligning with their political priorities.
• Racialized Social Constraints: Researchers have argued that in addition to policy, social networks within Black communities have historically enforced a norm of supporting the Democratic Party, prioritizing group solidarity in party politics.
• Opposition to Oppression: Black Americans often associate the modern Republican Party with policies they view as against their interests, such as "states' rights" appeals and opposition to certain civil rights measures, which caused a long-term trend of over 90% of Black voters supporting Democratic candidates. 

SEGREGATION by Democrat Party

 

DEMOCRATS CREATED THE KKK TO MUSCLE AROUND THEIR POLITICAL OPPONENTS, THE REPUBLICANS & BLACKS!

Historically, the Southern wing of the 

Democratic Party was the primary force behind segregation, implementing Jim Crow laws after Reconstruction to enforce racial separation. These "Southern Democrats" resisted civil rights gains, often operating as a bloc within the party until the 1960s when the party national platform endorsed civil rights, causing segregationists to break away and eventually align with the Republican Party.  

Key Details on Political Segregationists:

• Southern Democrats: For nearly a century, white Southern Democrats controlled the South and upheld segregation through voting restrictions, violence, and discriminatory legislation.
• Dixiecrats (1948): A splinter group known as the States Rights Democratic Party was formed by Southern Democrats who walked out of the 1948 Democratic National Convention to protest civil rights policies.
• The Shift: After Democratic Presidents JFK and LBJ championed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, many segregationist voters and politicians shifted to the Republican Party over the following decades, a transition sometimes described by the "Southern Strategy".
• National Parties: While Southern Democrats were the architects of Jim Crow, northern Democrats and some Republicans often offered little challenge to these policies during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. 

It is important to note that the platforms of both major parties have undergone significant transformations since the late 19th century. 

American Japanese Incarceration/ CONCENTRATION Camps Initiated by Democrats

 

The internment of Japanese Americans during World War II was authorized by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, a 

Democrat, who signed Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942, reflecting a broad, bipartisan, and West Coast-driven effort fueled by wartime hysteria, fear, and racism, rather than a single party's actions.  

Key details regarding the political landscape of this action include:

• The Democratic Administration: Executive Order 9066 was signed by FDR (Democrat), with his administration and military officials executing the removal of over 120,000 Japanese Americans from their homes.
• Broad Political Support: While initiated by a Democratic president, the move had significant, often bipartisan, support, particularly from politicians, media, and organized groups on the West Coast, such as the Native Sons of the Golden West.
• Limited Dissent: While most politicians supported the actions, notable exceptions included individuals like Republican Governor Ralph Carr of Colorado, who opposed the internment, and Senator Robert Taft of Ohio.
• Internal Views: Some organizations, such as the Communist Party, failed to oppose, or even supported, the internment.  

The Trail of Tears was initiated by The Democrat Party

 

https://youtube.com/shorts/baPELZL-eEg?si=Pc5AMsoXZP0Ycmp4

https://youtube.com/shorts/4ayzXf_EZec?si=gPtPvy2t6XurtzfL

The Trail of Tears was initiated by the 

Democratic Party under the presidency of Andrew Jackson. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was strongly supported by Jackson and Southern Democrats, with opposition primarily coming from the newly formed Whig Party, which opposed the forced relocation of Native Americans. 

Key details regarding the Trail of Tears:

• Political Party: The Democratic Party, specifically under the administration of President Andrew Jackson.
• Context: The policy aimed to expand U.S. territory by moving Native American tribes from the Southeast to land west of the Mississippi.
• Opposition: The Whig Party, along with some religious groups, opposed the Indian Removal Act.
• Legality: Despite a Supreme Court ruling defending Cherokee sovereignty, the Jackson administration continued with the removal. 

The Indian Removal Act passed with a narrow majority in the House, reflecting the party-line division of the era on this issue.