Friday, January 30, 2026

The McCarran-Walter Act Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952

 


Free speech should never be extended to those (i.e., Muslims) who wish to END and ABOLISH free speech!


Islam is intolerant of people freely speaking critical of Islam.   In an Islamic country speaking critical of Islam will lead to a person being punished, even with execution.  Islam’s goal is to replace The U.S. Constitution with their Islamic Sharia Law!!!


ISLAM by definition is an ENEMY OF U.S.A. FREEDOM because their goal is to DESTROY OUR FREEDOM!

ISLAM is PRO-SLAVERY like their Prophet who owned SLAVES as a model for Muslims.

Muslims are under SLAVERY because they are not free to leave Islam.  Leaving Islam aka Apostasy is punished by DEATH!  - Just like gangs and cults!


The main GOAL of ISLAM is to SUBMIT/ CONVERT everyone to their religion or DIE!  They want every person and country under their Islamic authority and control. 


1. At the start, they appear weak and in need like a refugee and get freebies.

2. They get some sway and become indignant of those not being holy like them.

3. They get their numbers up and want to take over the place.


They should have never been here in the first place!  Their ideology disqualifies them from being U.S. American citizens because their political-religion must be the ruling dominant superior leader.


ISLAM by definition is INCOMPATIBLE, contrary, OPPOSED & an ENEMY to The U.S.A., Our U.S. CONSTITUTION, WESTERN WORLDVIEW-VALUES-CULTURE, FREEDOM of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, Petitioning Govt…. 

So why the FORK are Muslims even here?


They were let in by THE LEFTIST COMMIE ZIONIST DEMOCRAT-RINOS to OVERTHROW and replace us!


ISLAM vs THE FIRST AMENDMENT  https://tueseahkiong.blogspot.com/2025/12/islam-vs-first-amendment.html





The McCarran-Walter Act Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 
was a landmark, controversial U.S. law that codified immigration laws, retained racist national-origins quotas, but also ended the complete exclusion of Asians, creating a complex legacy with anti-communist security provisions and a preference system for skilled workers and family, establishing the foundation for modern immigration policy despite being widely amended later. Enacted over President Truman's veto, it allowed for broad government power to deport suspected subversives, intertwining immigration with Cold War security fears. 

KEY ASPECTS

National Origins Quota: It preserved the restrictive national-origins quota system from 1924, favoring Northern Europeans. 


End of Asian Exclusion: It repealed laws banning Asian immigration, allowing limited numbers from Asian countries and permitting Asians to naturalize, though under a restrictive "Asia-Pacific Triangle" system. 
Cold War Security:  The Act included strong anti-communist provisions, allowing exclusion and deportation of individuals deemed subversive, a key concern during the Cold War. 
Preference System:  Introduced a system favoring skilled workers and family reunification, with non-quota status for spouses and parents of U.S. citizens. 



Presidential Veto:  President Truman vetoed the bill, calling it "un-American," but Congress overrode his veto. 




Foundation for Modern Law:  It served as the primary immigration law for decades, influencing demographics and citizenship. 

Amended by Hart-Celler:  The Hart-Celler Act  
 of 1965 largely abolished the discriminatory national-origins quota system, significantly changing the Act's impact. 




Enduring Provisions:  Despite major changes, some of its security-focused powers and structural elements remained influential for years.



Muslim Leaders Inciting VIOLENCE, Extortion, DEATH, & Slavery Upon Us Western Infidels Who Took These Ungrateful REFUGEE SNAKES In!




https://youtu.be/KgKwUc4EhQ0?si=JcB8BD1Q-LSyaQ14


The video by True Brit Media presents three clips of Islamist speakers who, according to the host, use "spine-tingling, horrific, terrifying words" (0:13-0:18) that reveal their intentions. The host emphasizes that these are not "empty threats" (0:37) and expresses concern that such speeches are allowed to circulate widely on social media without consequences, unlike "hateful posts online" (0:52) by ordinary citizens in Britain.


Here's a breakdown of the video's main points:


Inferiority of non-Muslims (1:26-1:44): The host highlights the belief among these speakers that non-Muslims are "inferior" and "need a consequence for not being what they are."


Clip 1: Conversion, Taxation, or Conflict (2:18-3:07): This clip features a speaker outlining three options for non-Muslims in conquered lands:

    1.  Convert to Islam (2:26-2:28).

    2.  Pay taxation (Jizya) (2:32-2:36), under which Muslims protect them but they must live under Sharia law, prohibiting activities like opening nightclubs or fornication (2:51-2:57).

    3.  Fight, which leads to capture, enslavement, and confiscation of land (2:57-3:05). The speaker suggests this will happen when Muslims become strong in the "coming 40, 50 years" (3:10-3:14).


Clip 2: Growing Muslim Numbers and Force (5:10-6:25): Another speaker discusses the large Muslim population in Europe, stating that if united, it would form one of the largest Muslim countries globally (5:12-5:38). He asserts that the Muslim community needs to "start acting as if we have the upper hand because we do" (5:52-5:56) and mentions the "concept of martyrdom" (6:16-6:20) as an advantage. The host interprets this as a call to "taking over use of force, power, martyrdom" (6:57-7:00), emphasizing that it's "never spoken in a way of positivity" (7:15-7:18).


Clip 3: Inciting Violence (7:42-8:56): The final clip features a speaker instructing listeners on how to "terrorize" and "frighten" the enemies of Allah (7:50-8:00) by "put[ting] fear and terror in the hearts of the enemy" (8:04-8:06). He explicitly details how to disable opponents by hitting "above the necks" (8:14) or cutting their "fingers" (8:24) to prevent them from fighting. The host condemns this as "telling people how to kill" and "inciting it" (9:43-9:51), calling it a "hate crime" and a "threat" (10:04-10:11).


The video concludes with the host questioning why authorities are "so scared to act upon these hate crimes" (10:02-10:04) and whether society will regret its inaction in the future (10:51-11:13). He advocates for silencing such individuals and denying them a platform (11:37-11:41) and encourages viewers to spread awareness (11:18-11:28).

Thursday, January 29, 2026

The Hart-Celler Act of 1965

 






The Hart-Celler Act of 1965—formally the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965—was a landmark piece of legislation that fundamentally transformed American society by abolishing the discriminatory "national origins" quota system. 


Key Provisions 


Abolished National Quotas: It ended the system established in the 1920s that favored Northern and Western Europeans and virtually banned immigrants from Asia, Africa, and parts of Southern and Eastern Europe.

Established Preference Categories: Entry was instead based on a seven-category preference system prioritizing:

Family Reunification: Visas for relatives of U.S. citizens and legal residents (accounting for about 74% of the total).

Professional Skills: Visas for workers with specialized skills or "exceptional ability".

Refugee Status: A formal avenue for those fleeing political turmoil or natural disasters.

Hemispheric Caps: For the first time, it imposed a numerical limit on immigration from the Western Hemisphere (120,000 annually) while setting a 170,000 cap for the Eastern Hemisphere. 



HISTROICAL SIGNIFICANCE:


Signed at the Statue of Liberty: President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the act on October 3, 1965, calling the old system "un-American".

Civil Rights Context: The act was seen as an extension of the civil rights movement, aiming to eliminate racial and ethnic bias from federal law alongside the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Demographic Shift: While sponsors initially claimed it would not "upset the ethnic mix," the law led to a dramatic increase in immigration from Asia and Latin America. In 1965, the U.S. was approximately 85% white; by 2015, that figure dropped to 62%. 


UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES: 


Chain Migration: The heavy emphasis on family reunification allowed for "chain migration," where one immigrant could eventually sponsor numerous extended family members.

Illegal Immigration: By capping Western Hemisphere immigration and ending the Bracero Program (guest worker program) in 1964, the act inadvertently laid the groundwork for a rise in undocumented immigration from Mexico and Central America. 

 


PROS & CONS:


The 1965 Hart-Celler Act (Immigration and Nationality Act) revolutionized U.S. immigration by abolishing national-origins quotas, promoting diversity, and prioritizing family reunification. While it spurred economic growth, innovation, and a more diverse population, it also led to unforeseen, high levels of immigration and increased undocumented migration from Latin America. 

Pros of the Hart-Celler Act 

Abolished Racist Quotas: It eliminated the 1924 national origins quota system, which had heavily favored Northern Europeans and restricted others, replacing it with a more equitable system.

Increased Diversity & Talent: The Act brought immigrants from Asia, Africa, and other regions, increasing diversity.

Economic & Demographic Boost: Immigrants contributed to economic growth, filled STEM roles, and helped make the population younger.

Family Reunification: A primary focus was reuniting families, allowing U.S. citizens to sponsor relatives. 

Cons of the Hart-Celler Act 

Unintended High Immigration Levels: The shift in focus to family reunification led to "chain migration" and higher-than-expected immigration numbers.

Undocumented Immigration Surge: The Act set strict limits on the Western Hemisphere (previously unrestricted), which, combined with the end of the Bracero program, forced thousands of Mexican workers into undocumented status.

Shift in Cultural Composition: Critics argue that rapid, high-volume immigration challenged existing social cohesion and, as noted in History, Art & Archives, significantly altered the nation's demographics.

Administrative and Social Pressure: The influx placed strain on public services and increased competition for low-skilled jobs. 

The law remains the foundation of modern U.S. immigration policy, with its long-lasting effects still heavily debated today



The McCarran-Walter Act Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952  https://tueseahkiong.blogspot.com/2026/01/blog-post_30.html

The Smiths - How Soon Is Now?

 



https://youtu.be/hnpILIIo9ek?si=bOrvjn7XhLpOXD68

Immigrant Song Led Zeppelin





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdVoDbPBhrc


LOVE ROCKIN' OUT TO THIS JAM!!!


ORDER OF OPERATIONS

 





The order of mathematical operations, remembered by the acronym PEMDAS (or BODMAS), dictates the sequence for solving equations: Parentheses (or Brackets), then Exponents (or Orders), followed by Multiplication and Division (from left to right), and finally Addition and Subtraction (from left to right). This convention ensures everyone gets the same answer for the same problem, preventing ambiguity.

 The PEMDAS/BODMAS Order:

1 Parentheses / Brackets: Solve any operations inside grouping symbols first, starting with the innermost ones.

2 Exponents / Orders: Calculate powers and roots next.

3 Multiplication & Division: Perform these from left to right as they appear.

4 Addition & Subtraction: Complete these from left to right as they appear.


All Federal Reserve Bank Chairman (Governor) since 1913

 



Jerome H. Powell is the current Chair (2018–present). Other notable long-serving chairs include Alan Greenspan (1987–2006) and William McChesney Martin Jr. (1951–1970). 


Here is the chronological list of Federal Reserve Chairmen/Governors since 1913:
  1. Charles S. Hamlin (1914–1916)
  2. William P.G. Harding (1916–1922)
  3. Daniel R. Crissinger (1923–1927)
  4. Roy A. Young (1927–1930)
  5. Eugene I. Meyer (1930–1933)
  6. Eugene R. Black (1933–1934)
  7. Marriner S. Eccles (1936–1948)
  8. Thomas B. McCabe (1948–1951)
  9. William McChesney Martin Jr.(1951–1970)
  10. Arthur F. Burns (1970–1978)
  11. G. William Miller (1978–1979)
  12. Paul A. Volcker (1979–1987)
  13. Alan Greenspan (1987–2006)
  14. Ben S. Bernanke (2006–2014)
  15. Janet L. Yellen (2014–2018)
  16. Jerome H. Powell (2018–Present) 
Note: Prior to the Banking Act of 1935, the leader was titled "Governor."