What groups in the USA are the freakiest in getting the most STD's?

 

Based on 2024-2025 data, Detroit, Philadelphia, and Montgomery have the highest overall STD rates, with many top cities located in the South. Significant racial disparities exist, as non-Hispanic Black individuals, who make up 12.6% of the population, account for 32.4% of reported chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis cases, often driven by healthcare access barriers.  

https://fb.watch/GF6K3RSd6i/

In the United States, Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, and American Indian/Alaska Native populations experience disproportionately higher rates of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) compared to white populations. Black individuals, in particular, are disproportionately affected by infections like gonorrhea and chlamydia. 

Key details on STD disparities:

• Black Population: CDC data shows Black individuals face the highest STD rates, representing, for instance, a large percentage of reported gonorrhea cases.
• Hispanic and Native Populations: Hispanic/Latino and American Indian/Alaska Native groups also consistently show higher STI prevalence than white populations.
• Contributing Factors: The disparities are driven by systemic issues rather than individual behavior, including lack of health insurance, reduced access to quality healthcare, poverty, high incarceration rates, and stigma.
• Sexual Networks: Lower ratios of men to women in certain communities can lead to denser sexual networks, allowing for more rapid spread of infections.
• Disparities in Care: Even when controlling for risky behaviors, disparities persist, indicating that limited access to screening and treatment is a primary factor. 

These findings highlight that health, socio-economic, and environmental factors contribute to these significant racial disparities in sexual health. 

WATCH:

https://youtu.be/uR9DUZvO8yU?si=ZOLw9B5UECLf72Hd

Top Cities with Highest Overall STD Rates

• Detroit, MI: Ranked highest overall in 2025.
• Philadelphia, PA: Ranked second overall.
• Montgomery, AL: Ranked third in 2025, consistently high.
• Baltimore, MD: Historically ranked very high, particularly for syphilis and gonorrhea.
• Jackson, MS: Frequently in the top 3-12 for high STI rates.
• San Francisco, CA: Ranks highly, especially for high rates of syphilis.

Key Findings on Racial Disparities (CDC Data)

• Black/African American Community: Disproportionately affected, with gonorrhea rates over eight times higher than white males. Studies show higher prevalence of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae in young Black individuals.
• Hispanic/Latino Community: Congenital syphilis rates are more than double those of white people.
• Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander: Chlamydia rates are over three times higher than among white people.
• American Indian/Alaska Native: Experience high congenital syphilis rates, nearly twelve times higher than white populations, often due to healthcare inequities, particularly in regions like South Dakota.

Regional and Social Drivers

• The South: Seven of the top 10 states with the highest STD rates are in the South.
• Causes: Disparities are largely driven by social determinants, including poverty, lack of access to healthcare, lack of insurance, and unstable housing.
• Highest Infection Locations: High-ranking cities often have higher percentages of minority residents who face these systemic disparities. 

For localized information, check reports from the California Department of Public Health, Pennsylvania Department of Health, and the CDC. 

https://youtu.be/53gZIXiWu84?si=BOeFUJhkqAcF2nmw

Top 10 States/Regions by HIV Diagnosis Rate (per 100,000):

1. District of Columbia – 36.6 (2:38-2:54)
2. Georgia – 26.2 (3:01-3:29)
3. Louisiana – 23.3 (3:34-4:02)
4. Florida – 22.3 (4:06-4:26)
5. Texas – 19.8 (4:31-4:57)
6. Nevada – 19.6 (5:00-5:26)
7. Mississippi – 17.0 (5:29-6:23)
8. North Carolina – 16.0 (6:25-7:17)
9. South Carolina – 15.0 (7:19-8:06)
10. Alabama – 14.7 (8:08-8:54)
11. New Jersey – 14.6 (8:56-9:20)

Why Bring in Immigrants Who Are 50-80% on WELFARE? Dem Voters!

 

Religion is Location?

The religion one embraces is the one that they are usually brought up in due to their family's location?

 

ACTS 6 vs ACTS 10 by Ken Attwood

 

Acts 6:5 calls Nicolas a proselyte of Antioch, and people jump straight to “Gentile convert,” but that definition comes later, not from the first century.

Acts 6:5 “And the saying pleased the whole multitude. And they chose Stephen, a man full of faith and the HOLY SPIRIT, and Philip, Prochorus, Nicanor, Timon, Parmenas, and NICOLAS, a PROSELYTE from Antioch,

In that period, proselytizing was largely internal. Diaspora Israelites, Hellenized Jews, people who had drifted from covenant life, they were the focus, not pagans off in temples with no connection to Israel.

So calling Nicolas a proselyte does not prove he was a non-Israelite. It fits clean with an Israelite from the dispersion coming back into covenant order and being recognized among the community.

Now look at the reaction to Nicolas. There is none. No controversy, no debate, no raised questions, no need for Peter to explain anything, he is chosen, hands are laid on him, he received the Holy Spirit, and the story moves on.

That silence matters. It shows nothing about Nicolas challenged covenant boundaries, which only makes sense if he was already within Israel’s recognized framework, meaning circumcised and aligned with the covenant.

Then Acts 10 hits and everything flips. Cornelius receives the Spirit and the circumcised believers are shocked, Peter has to justify what happened, and the whole thing gets debated in Jerusalem.

That reaction tells you what the issue was. If Cornelius were just another Gentile convert like people claim, there would be no shock because Acts 6 already had Nicolas in leadership with zero pushback.

So what’s the difference between the two? Circumcision. Nicolas is already recognized within covenant order, Cornelius is uncircumcised, and Genesis 17:14 says the uncircumcised male is cut off from the people.

That’s why the reaction is so strong. The Spirit falling on someone in that condition looks like a violation of Torah categories, not the inclusion of a brand new ethnicity.

Peter’s confusion lines up with that. The issue is not “a Gentile got saved,” the issue is that someone considered cut off is being restored without first coming through the expected covenant marker.

That fits the prophets. Ezekiel 36 and Jeremiah 31 speak about cleansing, restoration, and the Spirit being given to Israel, not to pagan nations with no covenant history.

Put both chapters side by side. Acts 6 has no astonishment because the covenant structure stays intact. Acts 10 has astonishment because an uncircumcised man is receiving what was promised to Israel.

Same people group, different covenant condition. One is already recognized inside, the other was cut off and is now being restored.

So here’s the question that exposes the problem. If Acts 6 already had a so-called Gentile fully accepted with no controversy, why does Acts 10 explode with debate over the same supposed category?

You don’t get opposite reactions to the same thing. The difference isn’t ethnicity, it’s covenant status, and once you see that, the whole narrative locks into place.

Quadratic Formula

 

Govt saves Billion$ in Social Security payments by seniors dying off from Covid

 

Based on research from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)and other studies, COVID-19 deaths actually reduced future Social Security liabilities by an estimated 

 billion to 

 billion, primarily due to the death of beneficiaries. While saving billions in future payments, this impact also included increased survivor benefits and reduced payroll tax revenue, with the net financial effect on Social Security funds estimated at approximately 

 billion. 

• Financial Impact: Researchers found that "excess deaths" from COVID-19 reduced future Social Security obligations by roughly 
  
  
   billion, which provided a boost to the trust fund's long-term solvency.
• Net Savings Details: The net gain of 
  
  
   billion is a combined figure considering the reduction in retirement payments due to deaths, offset by a 
  
  
   billion increase in survivor benefits for spouses and children.
• Long-Term Effect: These savings are relatively small in the context of the total Social Security program, which pays out that amount in benefits every few months.
• Context: While the pandemic resulted in an estimated 1.4 million "excess deaths" among people aged 25 and older between 2020 and 2023, studies indicate these premature deaths, while tragic, improved the financial position of the Social Security program. 

A separate, often confused, statistic is that federal agencies, including the Treasury, made over 

 billion in improper stimulus payments to deceased individuals, which is different from long-term Social Security benefit savings.